Emily Rodgers, Ph.D.

Emily Rodgers, Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Contact Info:

  • E-mail: rodgers.42@osu.edu
  • Office: 204B Ramseyer
  • Phone: (614) 292-9288
  • Fax: (614) 292-4260

Mailing Address:

  • 29 W. Woodruff Ave.
  • Columbus, OH 43210-1177

Biography

Emily Rodgers is an associate professor in the College of Education and Human Ecology at The Ohio State University. She has worked in schools as a reading specialist and special education teacher and now teaches graduate courses in early literacy and reading development at OSU. Her research focuses on the professional development of teachers and scaffolding literacy learning particularly for young children having great difficulty learning to read and write. Her co-authored volume, Coaching Conversations was published in 2007 by Teachers College Press.

Educational Background

  • 1998 - Doctor of Philosophy The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Language Arts, Children's Literature and Reading
  • 1995 - Master of Arts The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Language Arts, Children's Literature and Reading
  • 1989 - Additional Qualifications in Reading University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
  • 1988 - Bachelor of Special Education Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland
  • 1985 - Bachelor of Arts - Education Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland

Research Interests

  • Scaffolding literacy learning
  • Professional development of literacy teachers.

The lines of inquiry that I am pursuing as an associate professor at Ohio State have their roots in my early professional career. As a teacher, I began to investigate questions related to struggling readers. I knew they could make progress, but could they catch up with their peers? How could I provide the instruction that would lead to accelerated progress?" These questions led me to my Ph.D. program and the two intersecting lines of inquiry that have been the focus of my academic work: scaffolding literacy learning for children having great difficulty learning to read and the professional development of literacy teachers. From this background of teaching experiences and early research, I developed several research questions related to identifying and describing critical features of expert literacy instruction. Specifically, I have investigated the role of language in scaffolding (or lifting) the literacy learning of children having difficulty learning to read. The following questions have guided this inquiry:

  1. What is the nature of teaching interactions, as characterized by the patterns of talk, between teacher and child in a one-to-one tutoring setting?
  2. How do patterns of interactions during critical learning moments further the child's literacy acquisition?

My research has led me to realize that in order to make a difference for struggling readers, we need to intervene as early as first grade, as soon as it becomes apparent that the child's trajectory of progress is off course. My review of the literature also led me to conclude that in order to catch up with their peers, children having great difficulty learning to read and write need to be taught by specially trained literacy teachers in a one-to-one setting. One of my major accomplishments thus far from this line of inquiry has been to develop a way to categorize teacher talk in terms of its function (to demonstrate, to direct, to question, to praise, to tell, or to confirm). I developed this tool as a result of my dissertation research for which I received a national award for outstanding student research from the National Reading Conference. We can not investigate effective instruction without inquiring into teachers' thinking and learning and this understanding leads to my second line of inquiry: the nature of effective professional development. My research in this area has been guided by the following research questions:

  1. How do teachers learn to provide scaffolds for student learning?
  2. What support systems can lead to positive shifts in teaching?

I have conducted 16 case studies on effective literacy tutoring. These case studies involve eight Reading Recovery teachers; five in Ohio and three in Auckland, New Zealand and 16 first grade students. My goal is to advance a theory of scaffolding literacy learning based on these case studies that can be tested in an empirically designed study.

Activities

The main goal of my professional activities has been to make a difference in the literacy lives of young children having great difficulty learning to read and write. Why is this important? For one, Juel (1988) showed with her longitudinal research that the children in her study who fell behind in first grade had about an 88% chance of still being behind in fourth grade, while average students had a 12% chance of struggling with reading later on. Through my research, publications, teaching, consultation, conference presentations, I have been working with teachers or literacy coaches (called teacher leaders) who all work directly with students, to make a difference to teaching and learning.

Honors

National Reading Conference's Outstanding Student Research Award, 1999
Reading Recovery Trainer Fellowship
Amount: $7,500 NZD
June 2002 - August 2002
This award was given to carry out research, "Scaffolding Reading Performance in Reading Recovery Lessons", in Auckland, New Zealand for which I was the principal investigator.

Selected Grants History

  • Reading Recovery Evaluation
    Sponsor: Ohio Department of Education
    Amount: $90,000
    July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006
    I direct the evaluation of Reading Recovery in Ohio and contribute approximately 75% to the total effort.
  • Reading Recovery Evaluation
    Sponsor: Ohio Department of Education
    Amount: $90,000
    July 1, 2006 - June 30, 2007
    I direct the evaluation of Reading Recovery in Ohio and contribute approximately 75% to the total effort.
  • Teacher Quality Research Grant
    Sponsor: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Dept. of Education
    Amount: $451,567
    July 2004 - August 2005
    Principal Investigator: Patricia Scharer
  • Excellence in Engagement Grant, University Outreach and Engagement
    Preparing Expert Literacy Volunteers in Schools
    Amount: $80,000
    July 2006- July 2008
    Principal Investigator: Adrian Rodgers
    Partners in this project include Columbus Public Schools and the Columbus Education Association-Retired Teachers (CEA-R

Selected Publications

  • Rodgers, A. & Rodgers, E. (2007). The Effective Literacy Coach. Teachers College Press.
  • Rodgers, A. & Rodgers, E. (2007). Preparing for diversity: Professional development for today's teachers. In M. Schulz & B. Honchell (Eds.). (pp. 262-294). Literacy for Diverse Learners. Christopher Gordon.
  • Rodgers, E. & Gómez-Bellengé, F. X. (2006). Reading Recovery in Ohio. 2005-2006 Final Project Report. Columbus, OH: National Data Evaluation Center.
  • Gómez-Bellengé, F. X., Rodgers, E. (2006). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura National Report, 2004 - 2005. Columbus, OH: National Data Evaluation Center.
  • Pinnell, G.S. & Rodgers, E.M. (2004). Reflective inquiry as a tool for professional development. In D. Strickland & M. Kamil (Eds). Improving reading achievement through professional development (pp169-193). Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
  • Rodgers, A. & Rodgers E. (Eds) (2004). Strategies for Scaffolding Literacy Instruction in K-4 Classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Rodgers, E. (2004). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 501-532.
  • Rodgers, E., Gómez-Bellengé, F. X. (2003). Closing the achievement gap in Ohio with Reading Recovery. Journal of Reading Recovery, 3(1), 65-74.
  • Rodgers, E. & Pinnell, G. (2002). Learning from teaching in literacy education: New perspectives on professional development. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman
  • Rodgers, E., Fullerton, S. & DeFord, D. (2001). What does it take to reform instructional practices? In J.V. Hoffman, D.L. Schallert, C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy & B. Maloch (Eds.), Fiftieth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 519 - 531). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

Courses Taught

  • Reading Difficulties
  • Trends and Issues in Teaching Reading in the Elementary School

© 2009, The Ohio State University If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact webmaster@ehe.osu.edu.