| Admissions
Philosophy
Faculty
MA Program
PhD Program
Program Policies
School Psych Home |
Evaluation
Evaluation of students in The
OSU School Psychology Program is conducted at two levels. First, students are
evaluated in each course, and these procedures are clearly described in the
course syllabi. Course objectives and assignments correspond with the
competencies described elsewhere in the handbook. Also, students who do not
receive at least a B- in the core school psychology courses will not be allowed
to continue in the course work within that sequence and will be expected to
retake the course in which they received less than a B-. The OSU Graduate School
also mandates that students must maintain a 3.0 GPA every quarter they are
admitted to a graduate program. Students who do not maintain this 3.0 average
will be placed on probation. In addition, students who are on assistantship and
who drop below a 3.0 will be in danger of losing their assistantship. Please
refer to the OSU Graduate School Handbook for more information regarding these
policies.
In addition to evaluation at
the course level, students are also evaluated at the program level. Course
evaluation is important, but does not provide students with a more comprehensive
overview of their progress in the program. Students will receive written
feedback on their progress in acquiring the program competencies at the end of
each academic year. Students who wish to receive verbal feedback or
clarification on the written feedback need to make an appointment with their
advisor. Students will be expected to complete and sign the Master's Annual
Review Form and return to the program director within two weeks of receipt.
Students must make reasonable progress as outlined in the Graduate Studies
Handbook, the School of PAES Graduate Studies Handbook, and the School
Psychology Program Handbook.
At the end of the first year
in the master's program, the annual review process will focus on advancement to
practicum. Students who do not rate high enough on the Master's Annual Review Form and/or who are deemed as lacking in sufficient
professional or clinical skill by the faculty, can be withheld from the second
year practicum. If students are not allowed to advance to the second year
practicum, they will be required to complete the practicum the following year
(if they successfully advance to practicum at that time), thus delaying
completion of the program. In addition to waiting to take the master's
practicum, students may also be required to take additional coursework to
remediate areas of weakness for the student.
Towards the end of the second
year in the master's program, students will again complete the annual review
process that focusing on advancement to internship. Again, students who do not
have high enough ratings on the Master's Annual Review Form, do not successfully
complete practicum, and/or who are deemed as lacking in sufficient professional
or clinical skill by the faculty will not be placed on internship. The
internship form will be used as the evaluation tool for performance while on
internship. Students who do not successfully complete internship will not be
given the needed paperwork to file for certification. Copies of all forms
related to student performance while in the program will be kept in the
student's program folder.
In addition to this annual
review process, students are expected to create and maintain portfolios
representing their performance in the program. Students are required to bring
their current portfolio to each annual review. Students will be given
instructions on how to create their portfolio and vita in PAES 856, Roles and
Functions of School Psychologists. This portfolio will be very helpful for
students as they prepare for internship and apply for positions after completion
of the program. All faculty, practicum supervisors, and internship supervisors
will have access to the information in your portfolio. The faculty will evaluate
your portfolio during each annual review. In general, the portfolio should be
complete, professional in appearance, well organized, clearly written, and
contain the appropriate content for each written component. Your portfolio
should begin with a table of contents and should be organized using the format
found on the program web site. |